Human Rights & Privacy

Authorities (2)

• Eweida and others v United Kingdom [2013] ECHR 37 [judgment]
  David Thór Björgvinsson, President, Nicolas Bratza, Lech Garlicki, Päivi Hirvelä, Zdravka Kalaydjieva, Nebojša Vučinić, Vincent A. De Gaetano

  Human Rights; religion; the right to manifest religion (wearing a cross) was violated by BA's uniform policy. [Summary not yet checked against the judgment.]

  Referred to: cited by 2 in this knowledge base

  Cited by

  • Higgs v Farmor's School 10 paras
  • London Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Garrett 2 paras

  References found in the judgments’ text, with the number of paragraphs in which each case is mentioned. Not a classification: how a case was treated is recorded under Later history.

• Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (No 2) [2014] AC 700; [2013] UKSC 39 [judgment]
  Lord Sumption, Lord Neuberger

  Human Rights; proportionality; established the four-stage test for justifying interference with a convention right.

  Referred to: cited by 3 in this knowledge base

  Cited by

  • Higgs v Farmor's School 5 paras
  • Page v NHS Trust Development Authority 1 para
  • Secretary of State for Business and Trade v Mercer 1 para

  References found in the judgments’ text, with the number of paragraphs in which each case is mentioned. Not a classification: how a case was treated is recorded under Later history.